<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taxabull &#187; smoking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxabull.com/tag/smoking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxabull.com</link>
	<description>Australian Tax &#38; Accounting news. No BS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ATO wins! British American Tobacco faces tax bill of $89m</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/29/ato-says-nosmoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/29/ato-says-nosmoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>taxabull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax - Company]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax - Part IVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cases & Judgements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british american tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capital gains tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part IVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rothmans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.flickr.com/photos/machechy/ / CC BY 2.0
 
The ATO has won a Federal Court case against British American Tobacco and is looking to reap a tax bill of $89m.
The $89m comprises of $42m capital gains tax liability plus $11m of penalties and $36m of interest.
The Federal Court case relates to the sale of nine cigarette brands in 1999 as part [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_416" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/machechy/4137021781/"><img class="size-full wp-image-416" title="No Smoking" src="http://www.taxabull.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/no-smoking.jpg" alt="ATO says NO SMOKING..!!" width="500" height="375" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">ATO says NO SMOKING..!!</p></div>
<div><a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/machechy/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/machechy/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY 2.0</a></div>
<p> </p>
<p>The ATO has won a Federal Court case against <a title="British American Tobacco " href="http://www.bat.com/" target="_blank">British American Tobacco</a> and is looking to reap a tax bill of $89m.</p>
<p>The $89m comprises of $42m capital gains tax liability plus $11m of penalties and $36m of interest.</p>
<p>The Federal Court case relates to the sale of nine cigarette brands in 1999 as part of the worldwide merger of British American Tobacco plc and <a title="Rothmans International" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothmans_International" target="_blank">Rothmans International BV</a>.</p>
<p>Justice Arthur Emmett confirmed that the asset sale fell foul of Part IVA (Anti-tax avoidance provision) because the arrangement was predominatly designed to gain a tax benefit.</p>
<p>In summary, the arrangement allowed the capital gains on the sale to be rolled over to the parent company which at the time had accumulated capital losses.</p>
<p>The capital losses was then offset against the profits on sale resulting in no capital tax payable.</p>
<p>This case is related to a transaction in 1999. So, it is evident that the ATO is becoming more willing to use Part IVA to keep corporate Australia on their toes.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Taxabull Team</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Source:</p>
<p><a title="SMH BusinessDay" href="http://www.businessday.com.au/business/tobacco-giant-faces-89m-bill-20091222-lbs0.html" target="_blank">Article by Elisabeth Sexton for SMH BusinessDay on 23 Dec 2009</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/29/ato-says-nosmoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
