<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Taxabull &#187; high court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxabull.com/tag/high-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxabull.com</link>
	<description>Australian Tax &#38; Accounting news. No BS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:08:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>ATO vs Symone Anstis case dispute continues..!!</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/21/ato-vs-symone-anstis-round4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/21/ato-vs-symone-anstis-round4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 23:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>taxabull</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tax - Individuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax - Tax Deductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Cases & Judgements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symone Anstis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth allowance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbill/ / CC BY 2.0

 
This is our continued coverage of this tax case regarding the deductibility of self-education expenses against Youth Allowance income&#8230;&#8230;
The full Federal Court found in favour of Symone Anstis on 4 November 2009.
However, the ATO has once again lodged an application on 2 December 2009 for special leave to appeal against this decision to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_410" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbill/3355278756/"><img class="size-full wp-image-410" title="Worshipful Master's Gavel" src="http://www.taxabull.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/gavel.jpg" alt="Justice will be served..!!" width="500" height="375" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Justice will be served..!!</p></div>
<div><a rel="cc:attributionURL" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbill/">http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrbill/</a> / <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">CC BY 2.0</a></div>
<p>
 </p>
<p>This is our continued coverage of this tax case regarding the deductibility of self-education expenses against Youth Allowance income&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>The full Federal Court found in favour of Symone Anstis on 4 November 2009.</p>
<p>However, the ATO has once again lodged an application on 2 December 2009 for special leave to appeal against this decision to the High Court.</p>
<p>This should be final rung in the ongoing dispute, so until then, the ATO&#8217;s existing non-deductible view stands.</p>
<p>Keep those tax receipts though as we think that Symone has a very strong case to argue.</p>
<p><span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">TIMELINE OF EVENTS (UPDATED)</span> </p>
<div>17/11/2006  ATO issues an amended tax assessment to Symone</div>
<div>27/11/2006  Symone objects to amendment</div>
<div>05/12/2006  ATO disallows Symone’s objection</div>
<div>12/12/2006  Symone goes to Tribunal to dispute ATO decision</div>
<div>18/04/2007  Tribunal rules in favour of ATO</div>
<div>21/07/2008  Symone appeals to the Federal Court</div>
<div>01/04/2009  The Federal Court rules in favour of Symone</div>
<div>29/05/2009  The ATO appeals against the Federal Court decision</div>
<div>04/11/2009   The full Federal Court dismisses the ATO’s appeal</div>
<div>02/12/2009   The ATO appeals the decision to the High Court</div>
<p> </p>
<div><strong>COURT JUDGEMENTS</strong></div>
<div><a href="http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?rank=find&amp;criteria=AND~anstis~basic~exact&amp;target=CA&amp;style=java&amp;sdocid=JUD/*2007*AATA1238/00001&amp;recStart=1&amp;PiT=99991231235958&amp;recnum=3&amp;tot=6&amp;pn=ALL:::ALL" target="_blank">Symone Anstis and Commissioner of Taxation</a> – AAT (18 April 2007)</div>
<div><a href="http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?rank=find&amp;criteria=AND~anstis~basic~exact&amp;target=CC&amp;style=java&amp;sdocid=JUD/2009ATC20-098/00001&amp;recStart=1&amp;PiT=99991231235958&amp;recnum=4&amp;tot=6&amp;pn=ALL:::ALL" target="_blank">Anstis v Federal Commissioner of Taxation</a> – Federal Court (1 April 2009)</div>
<div><a href="http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?rank=find&amp;criteria=AND~anstis~basic~exact&amp;target=CC&amp;style=java&amp;sdocid=JUD/2009ATC20-142/00001&amp;recStart=1&amp;PiT=99991231235958&amp;recnum=5&amp;tot=6&amp;pn=ALL:::ALL" target="_blank">FC of T v Anstis</a> – Full Federal Court (4 November 2009)</div>
<p> </p>
<div>Fingers crossed&#8230;!</div>
<div>Taxabull Team</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/21/ato-vs-symone-anstis-round4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
