<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Taxabull</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.taxabull.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.taxabull.com</link>
	<description>Australian Tax &#38; Accounting news. No BS.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:24:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATO vs Symone Anstis case dispute continues..!! by mark</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/21/ato-vs-symone-anstis-round4/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=394#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Well the high court did the right thing and confirmed deductions against austudy and youth allowance are legal.
Now wait for the federal government to introduce retrospective legislation to deny them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the high court did the right thing and confirmed deductions against austudy and youth allowance are legal.<br />
Now wait for the federal government to introduce retrospective legislation to deny them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATO ALERT: Data-matching program targeting car sales by Shoes Red</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/04/09/ato-alert-data-matching-program-targeting-car-sales/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoes Red</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=34#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this very informative article, I wish you much success in all you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this very informative article, I wish you much success in all you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Income Tax Returns due on Saturday, 31 October 2009! by Jared Hottle</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/10/27/income-tax-returns-due-on-saturday-31-october-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Hottle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=354#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Howdy thanks for the new post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy thanks for the new post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATO vs Symone Anstis case dispute continues..!! by mark</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/21/ato-vs-symone-anstis-round4/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 09:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=394#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Leave was granted to the ATO (call me a synic,but i doubt it was ever not going to be granted)on friday 23 april 2010.
Even if the ATO were to lose the federal government would introduce retrospective legislation to deny claims because there is to much money at stake and they would argue that it was never the governments intention to have the deductions allowable &quot;in the spirit of the legislation&quot; that presently exists.
In any case it will be interesting to see if our learned friends on the high court interpret the existing legislation the way  the lower courts have until now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave was granted to the ATO (call me a synic,but i doubt it was ever not going to be granted)on friday 23 april 2010.<br />
Even if the ATO were to lose the federal government would introduce retrospective legislation to deny claims because there is to much money at stake and they would argue that it was never the governments intention to have the deductions allowable &#8220;in the spirit of the legislation&#8221; that presently exists.<br />
In any case it will be interesting to see if our learned friends on the high court interpret the existing legislation the way  the lower courts have until now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ATO vs Symone Anstis case dispute continues..!! by Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/12/21/ato-vs-symone-anstis-round4/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=394#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Is there any way to know when the case will be heard in the High Court? Thanks for your coverage so far. I&#039;m keen to see the results of this case!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way to know when the case will be heard in the High Court? Thanks for your coverage so far. I&#8217;m keen to see the results of this case!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Income Tax Returns due on Saturday, 31 October 2009! by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.taxabull.com/2009/10/27/income-tax-returns-due-on-saturday-31-october-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.taxabull.com/?p=354#comment-9</guid>
		<description>the ATO has a facebook page for the ATO lodgement due date. check it out here http://www.facebook.com/ATOetax?ref=ts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the ATO has a facebook page for the ATO lodgement due date. check it out here <a href="http://www.facebook.com/ATOetax?ref=ts" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/ATOetax?ref=ts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

